Is This a Case of Racism or not?

Dominic Grieve the Attorney General has instigated a debate about corruption in public life, naming and shaming specifically the Pakistani community as one section of our society who pose a threat to the well being of our representative democracy by their cultural affinity to corruption in their own country, which has been imported by “them” to the UK.

I guess this raises several points of interest centred mainly on his lack of overwhelming evidence. Something I thought an Attorney General might feel it incumbent upon him to provide when making such a statement. Interestingly, the points of evidence for his assertions are not answered directly by Mr Grieve in either his Telegraph interview or the ITV news item. He merely makes this bold statement.

 

Pakistani culture is endemically corrupt and that’s why we see this replicated in Britain.

 

There is no evidence provided other than isolated cases of election corruption, highlighted as being in communities with large Pakistani communities and therefore I (The Attorney General) can now make a stereotypical, limited assumption about all Pakistanis in this country.

 

I work in many countries around the world in Rule of Law and Governance and have had many conversations with colleagues who decry the fact that the work they do is made more difficult by the corruption in the countries we work in. This has happened in South America, Africa, The Caribbean, The Far East, The Middle East and other places including Eastern Europe. Please note, none of my colleagues have alluded to or addressed the corruption in British society, it always seems to be “Johnny Foreigner”.

 

Dominic Grieve has led a privileged life and inexorably risen through the party ranks. This may or may not be due to his public school upbringing, Oxbridge education and high society connections. I will leave you to decide whether he is really in touch with mainstream British society at all levels, cultures, nationalities and religions.

 

The questions for me are

“What does he know of ‘endemic corruption’ in Pakistan?”

“What does he know of the Pakistani community in UK”

Is he saying that second, third and fourth generations of British Pakistanis are slavishly following their forefathers who originally came to Britain for a better life in replicating their own endemically corrupt way of life back in the old country and that this represents a terrible threat to the traditionally whiter than white approach of native Britons to conducting their affairs in public office.

 

Has he so recently forgotten?

  1. MP’s expenses
  2. The LIBOR scandal
  3. The Leveson enquiry
  4. The Iraq Dossier

 

Do I need to go on? This may come as a surprise to you Mr Grieve but people are corrupt, no matter what their colour, culture, nationality or class. People in public life often fall short of the standards required of them by us the electorate. I would ask you to look back on your life and ask yourself this question.

“Have you ever put your self interest before your personal ethics?”

I think we all know what the answer probably is.

 

I believe that people, whoever they are and whatever their backgrounds are intrinsically honest and truthful. Where they are not, the law is there to deal with that minority, impartially and fairly, irrespective of their personal characteristics. As the Attorney General and a public servant I expect the same from you and in your position, you have the opportunity to enhance the law or not.

In making these statements you have created distrust, fear and loathing of others based on their community characteristics.

As a Minister, you have an obligation to lead all parts of the society and not to single out one section for approbation and admonishment. You have set back the integration agenda in one fell, crass swoop by 10-15 years.

Recently, one of your own party members highlighted how alienated people generally feel from your party. A party led by a group of societal elite, out of touch with the ordinary living and working lives of the electorate. You have compounded that tenfold by this unfeeling and ill thought out uttering.

 

Your party and you may well feel the backlash of this in 2015.

Since writing this article I see that Dominic Grieve has apologised. I am sure that must make everything OK now?

Nationalism and the Rise of the new 5th Column?

National Identity and Nationalism are often confused, however one is benign and a source of great comfort to individuals and groups of people the other is a danger to humankind and representative democracy itself. So, how to differentiate between the two?
National Identity is how one defines oneself in terms of culture, customs, language and commonality with others from a similar group. It is often associated with the historical growth of national borders but does not have to be so defined as in the example of Kurds, Sikhs and Roma Gypsies and other similar indigenous peoples who cross national borders and frontiers.
Nationalism on the other hand is a pernicious permission given to those who define themselves often using national identity to not just define “Other” but also to define “Other” as inferior.
Nationalism cultivates fear and loathing of “Other” as a menace to national identity, when of course national identity can never be in jeopardy, solely because of the fact that it resides in us as individuals, so therefore how can someone else remove it from us. It is intrinsic and therefore immoveable and has been cultivated over generations of shared values.

Historically, nationalism has fuelled the 5th columns of destruction and war between groups, often based on those restrictive national borders but certain conditions have to be met in order for this nationalism to grow sufficiently to such a crescendo that it gains enough momentum for the fear and loathing that it creates to be a movement strong enough to attack “Other”.
Unfortunately we are seeing the rise of those circumstances now across Europe and particularly in our own U.K.
Is it any coincidence that Greece then Spain and more latterly Cyprus blame Germany for the failings that they are currently experiencing? Is that not an expression of “Other”? I am jumping ahead of myself though. National surplus creates opportunities for all including incoming “Others” and as no society is perfect, those in need benefit from this with little outcry from the majority, who finance the support of the needy minority from taxation and philanthropy.
Extrapolate forward to the current conditions of austerity and all of a sudden the xenophobic minority seizes their opportunity to make “Other” the bogeyman and unparalleled threat to the fabric of our society. Britishness becomes a watchword for us and Non- Britishness a definition of “Other”, any other will do, so we see this not being driven along racial lines but by all irrespective of their heritage who define themselves as British. This was highlighted recently in “The Big Question” a TV discussion programme where an Asian man (UKIP) and a Jewish woman who claim to represent our Britishness were arguing against the immigration of Bulgarian Gypsies swamping our shores when Bulgaria and Romania enter the European Union. The language is inevitably one of threats to our borders, education, housing and employment from “Other”.
It is absolutely right that a balanced, factual discussion by the politicians in any representative democracy is undertaken to ensure the safety and prosperity of us all. This includes all national issues including immigration, but the skewing of that into “Other” merely feeds the Right, creating leverage for the rise of a 5th column whose only ideals are to use representative democracy, which is so sacred to all of us to fuel xenophobia, fear and loathing.
UKIP is one such party, the acceptable face of a metamorphasised BNP, EDL etc, the new 5th column in our midst which wishes to destroy the values of our country of acceptance, understanding and curiosity of “Other” and instead one which lulls us all with their persuasive rhetoric of the dangers to our Britishness (that tends to be how they define it) from “Other”.
Do not be lulled. Vote in every single election possible, national, local, parish, whatever election opportunity you can to say No to this vitriol of hate.
Otherwise the rise of this xenophobic Right will drive our ordinarily centre parties such as Labour and Tory and Lib Dem to appease, as they are already starting to do and move inexorably to the Right supporting a minority view of “Other”
The average voter turnout has consistently been falling in all elections since full enfranchisement at the turn of the century. This will be the death knell of representative democracy and in turn could be catastrophic for us all.

References
The Life and Death of Democracy- John Keane 2009 p562-9
Allport’s Scale of Prejudice and Discrimination -Gordon Allport 1954

Iraq- Not Just a Country of Conflict

I recently returned from working in Iraq. I lived for over a month in Baghdad in the British Embassy providing training to members of the Commission of Integrity, an organisation whose job is to stamp out corruption in the new post conflict Iraq. We were based in the Commission of Integrity building which is in the Green Zone training their investigators, who are mainly qualified defence lawyers. In a training team of four, comprising two classes of twenty people working with two trainers in each class, we provided training in many subjects including:- Ethics and Values and Beliefs,Criminal Intelligence,Risk Assessment,Investigation techniques,Forensics and Exhibit Handling,Investigative Interviewing, Media Management and Case Management and lastly Operational Planning.It was an intense and very satisfying four weeks of my life.

I viewed the deployment with some trepidation as you can imagine and how wrong could I be. The country is a great place,albeit there is still a lot of danger particularly outside the International Zone. The people are committed and desperate to take their country forward and undergo all sorts of danger to fulfil their committment. It is easy to forget that Iraq is the seat of civilisation and gave us assembly democracy long before the Greeks, cuneiform writing, mathematics and lots more. The people have a great sense of their own history and are extremely proud of their country.Often the participants, who would travel daily from the Red Zone into the Green Zone for training,would wait for long periods at the checkpoints for their escort to bring them into the Green Zone at great danger to themselves, but they never wavered and attended the training evey day without fail.
I have only admiration and respect for them all.

I also gained a great insight into Islam and how much it means to people. It is not all about fundamentalism,and some of the biased perspective we are fed in our press and media is downright untrue.
Islam is a faith of peace and of course all the Abrahamic faiths have much in common, but the bulk of people just wish to practise their faith in peace and tranquility.

So, what did I learn. Well I reinforced my learning that most people want the same things in life, to live peacefully, look after their family, gain satisfaction from work and to achieve the best they can for themselves and their children. Those things never change wherever one goes in this world.

I hope that I will return to Iraq and help in the rebuilding of this beautiful country to help the people to find their place in a world which needs them so we can all, widen respect and understanding of all people.

How does Equality and Inclusion help grow your business

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/business/news/9418848.How_diversity_helps_growth/