This burning question begins to trouble us all once again with this new and horrific event perpetrated on a quiet Woolwich street in london on that fateful day in May 2013
It is of course all too easy for commentators to inevitably launch into the kind of rhetoric which is unhelpful and inflammatory at this point which has once again happened but the question still remains hanging in the air unanswered despite all the public recriminations
Consider for a moment a window in time and what brings the lives of two disparate young people together
One has the benefit of a loving home life, a good education, health happiness, the respect of friends and colleagues, an honourable calling and expectations of success.
Another has none of these things,in fact quite the opposite, their home life may have constantly described them as useless and stupid, this was reinforced in a school where results, results and more results were the holy grail and teachers excluded them on that basis, this then minimised their chances of worthwhile and valuable work whilst all around them were pictures and examples of rampant consumerism which they are financially excluded from.
Let’s now describe how they might see themselves. The first is proud , has self esteem, confidence and their personal values and beliefs give them a positive world view which says if I work hard I will achieve all I want in my life and I am valued by society at large.
The other however is not able to say any of those things about themselves and in fact may say I am valueless. I am not valued or respected by others or society at large, I am denigrated as a person in the popular media and the groups I belong to are openly despised and ridiculed, but I also want the same things the other person has but when I look forward to the rest of my life I see I may never have those things in this society into which I was born.
This is not necessarily defined by social characteristics such as race, gender, religion, socio economic conditions, one political group or a different class although it maybe exacerbated by any or several of them in each individual case and can apply to anyone who finds themselves excluded, disenfranchised and unwanted by others, with no sense of belonging. Belonging being one of the most powerful and important emotions that we as human beings can feel giving us a raison d’etre and the glue that holds groups together no matter how small or large.
As in the case of a soldier who will feel all of the things in the first case and a murderer who will feel all of the things in the second case which then collide horrifically in a suburban London street.
How did the murderer begin to think he may feel all the honourable feelings imbued in the soldier by acting in this heinous way.
Was it the siren voices of others which said but we want you, we love and value you, we have an honourable calling which will make you somebody who matters and can be proud of in our world, just maybe those siren voices eventually begin to resonate in this disenfranchised young person and the blurring of the moral and ethical positions in that young person’s mind become a visual reality.
I know this maybe an uncomfortable truth but perhaps we are looking at this phenomenon in too superficial a way.
This maybe a problem of inequality and injustice and not any of the common and obvious hooks we like to use to rationalise this uncivilised behaviour, maybe just maybe we might start to approach the issue in a more lateral and broad minded way across society’s tranches of those disillusioned and excluded from what we call “society” and they call “them”
Perhaps the questions as a society we should be asking as did that brave woman who confronted the murderers is not only “What do you want?'” but also Why?
Blog
Categories
-
Previous Posts
- January 2021
- July 2020
- December 2019
- March 2019
- March 2018
- October 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- October 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
Reducing Radicalisation
Europe
The vexing question of Europe is troubling our political masters once again and once again the endless arguments of in or out are being pursued, so now maybe an appropriate time to take stock, stop rushing headlong into a political abyss and recognize where our, Britain’s best interests lay.
It may seem odd to bring the words Europe and Honour together, two seemingly unrelated words in a piece of this kind, but I think they are inextricably linked.
To review our position is to refer to Europe’s common history both of hundreds of years of inter-national war and peace culminating in the most disastrous war of all time in terms of the sheer scale of destruction meted out upon humankind. The Second World War which ensued now represents an indelible stain on the inability of the political classes to protect its people, whichever nationality you are. Luckily, the ordinary people who were called upon to fight that war prevailed and we now live in a continent which has seen the longest period of protracted peace throughout its history since nation states were formed. Representative democracy in one form or another has prevailed across more than 400 million people.
So, 1957 saw the Treaty of Rome which brought the economic community to Europe. In 1975 our politicians reneged on their responsibility to represent us under our current democratic system of representative democracy and asked the public in a national referendum to declare whether or not, we as a country should remain in the EU. The public responded overwhelmingly by 67% in favour of remaining part of Europe.
That should have been the end of the matter but our politicians disingenuously, periodically have chosen for either political gain or to curry favour with the No crowd to continue to dangle the carrot of EU membership whenever the whim takes them.
This is dishonourable in the extreme. We signed a treaty, as a nation said YES to remain part of Europe and to constantly test the loyalty of our allies in this way is small-minded, petty and represents the worst of a Little England mentality.
As an honourable nation we should honour our commitments to our allies and if we disagree with them have the discussion which articulates our discontent but not childishly threaten to take our toys home every time someone in our group of friends offends us. I have written at some length of my certainty of Europe and our place in it elsewhere in this blog and so without repeating myself, I believe that the benefits of the treaties we have signed far outweigh disadvantages in terms of Human Rights, Trade, Business opportunities, Peace and our clout in global terms. I suggest that we pride ourselves on honour as part of the British psyche and now is the time to demonstrate it.
Leadership is about consistency and authenticity in our relationships with others, in short it is about being honourable in word and deed.